We acted on behalf of the applicant husband in this case which provides guidance on how deceit of paternity may amount to misconduct to be considering by the family court when making a financial award.
Background
The judgment of FRB v DCA (No.2) was one of many over a period of litigation between two parties following the end of their relationship.
The couple were both from wealthy, billionaire families and had been married for 14 years. After the relationship had broken down, the husband sought a paternity test for their son, which revealed that he was not the biological father.
The Issue of Paternity & Misconduct
When determining a financial settlement, the conduct of the parties is one factor which is considered by the court, provided that the conduct “is such that it would be in the opinion of the court to be inequitable to disregard it”. Such conduct may be financial or non-financial. However, the family court is not ‘a court of morals’ and claims of bad behaviour or adultery will generally be insufficient as relevant conduct to affect the financial award.
However, Vardags successfully argued that the wife’s behaviour regarding the child’s paternity did indeed meet the threshold of being “inequitable to disregard”, as she had induced the husband to financially and emotionally commit to the child, knowing that she had been having an affair with another man. The judge in particular highlighted the emotional impact on the husband after discovering that he was not the child’s biological father.
Reviews
Truly an awe inspiring legal team. Excellent communicators, advisors and creative thinkers. Brilliant strategists, negotiating skills second to none. Strong team ethos working diligently to obtain the best outcome for their clients. Need I say more! Make the call!
MichelleThe break down of my marriage and the process of divorce for me has been one of the most difficult experiences that I have ever had to face.
Sarah
The information on this website is intended as a guide and does not constitute legal advice. Vardags do not accept liability for any errors in the information on this website, nor any losses stemming from reliance upon the statements made herein. All articles and pages aim to reflect the legal position at time they were published, and may have been rendered obsolete by subsequent developments in the law. Should you require specialist advice, tailored to your situation, please see how Vardags can help you.